Screener
DIVS vs HDV
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- HDV costs 0.37% less per year.
- HDV is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS covers global markets; HDV covers north america.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; HDV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | HDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -37.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and HDV
Explore further