Screener
DIV vs IDVZ
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIV costs 0.30% less per year.
- DIV is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIV covers north america markets; IDVZ covers global.
- DIV follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- DIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIV | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $155M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.57% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.3% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.29% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -52.74% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIV and IDVZ
Explore further