Screener
IDVZ vs EFAS
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFAS costs 0.20% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; EFAS uses index tracking.
- EFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $48M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and EFAS
Explore further