Screener
IDVZ vs SDIV
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Global X SuperDividend ETF
Key differences
- SDIV costs 0.17% less per year.
- SDIV is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; SDIV uses index tracking.
- SDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | SDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 8.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -56.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and SDIV
Explore further