Screener
DIVS vs ADIV
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.33% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $55M |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and ADIV
Explore further