Screener
DMXF vs EFRA
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF vs iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.35% less per year.
- DMXF is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DMXF | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $992M | $6M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.52% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 14.09% |
| Max drawdown | -34.52% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DMXF and EFRA
Explore further