Screener
DPST vs TZA
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- DPST costs 0.07% less per year.
- DPST follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, DPST has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DPST | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.92% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $496M | $270M |
| Since | 2015 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.80% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.9% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.8% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -26.1% | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 69.10% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -97.73% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DPST and TZA
Explore further