Screener
TZA vs FAS
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.11% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than TZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TZA follows a inverse strategy; FAS uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TZA | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $270M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 10.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -67.4% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +37.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -30.9% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.70 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.16% | 42.90% |
| Max drawdown | -99.70% | -85.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TZA and FAS
Explore further