Screener
DRGN vs MCHI
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- DRGN costs 0.20% less per year.
- MCHI is significantly larger than DRGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRGN | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -20.87% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRGN and MCHI
Explore further