Screener
DRGN vs ECNS
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- DRGN costs 0.20% less per year.
- ECNS is significantly larger than DRGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRGN | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $82M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.87% |
| Max drawdown | -20.87% | -63.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRGN and ECNS
Explore further