Screener
DVYA vs ADVE
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.30% less per year.
- DVYA is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DVYA follows a index tracking strategy; ADVE uses active selection.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DVYA | ADVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.3% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.00% | 16.71% |
| Max drawdown | -45.61% | -18.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DVYA and ADVE
Explore further