Screener
DVYA vs IDVZ
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.26% less per year.
- DVYA follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DVYA | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $155M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.3% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.00% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -45.61% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DVYA and IDVZ
Explore further