Screener
IDVZ vs ADIV
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $55M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and ADIV
Explore further