Screener
DYNF vs CORO
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.29% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than CORO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DYNF is classified as equity, while CORO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYNF | CORO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34.0B | $3.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.41 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.60% | 15.34% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DYNF and CORO
Explore further