Screener
EART vs EEMS
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- EART costs 0.13% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; EEMS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $452M |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and EEMS
Explore further