Screener
EART vs IEMG
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.50% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; IEMG covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +49.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 19.35% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and IEMG
Explore further