Screener
EART vs EEM
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- EART costs 0.13% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; EEM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $28.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +51.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 19.88% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and EEM
Explore further