Screener
EART vs EMBD
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.20% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EART covers global markets; EMBD covers emerging markets.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $256M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and EMBD
Explore further