Screener
EART vs GXIG
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.44% less per year.
- GXIG is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART is classified as equity, while GXIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EART covers global markets; GXIG covers north america.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; GXIG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | GXIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $175M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | — |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -3.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and GXIG
Explore further