Screener
EART vs SPEM
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.52% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; SPEM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and SPEM
Explore further