Screener
EART vs XCNY
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.40% less per year.
- EART is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; XCNY covers emerging markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $9M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and XCNY
Explore further