Screener
HSCZ vs MCHI
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- HSCZ costs 0.16% less per year.
- MCHI is significantly larger than HSCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HSCZ covers global markets; MCHI covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, HSCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HSCZ | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.31% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -34.89% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HSCZ and MCHI
Explore further