Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ECON vs XCNY

Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

ECON

Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.47%

Fund size

$326M

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • XCNY costs 0.28% less per year.
  • ECON is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ECON has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ECONXCNY
Annual cost (TER)0.47%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$326M$9M
Since20102024
Dividend yield1.51%2.41%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+60.5%+36.3%
CAGR 3Y+23.8%N/A
CAGR 5Y+7.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.08N/A
Volatility 1Y20.32%16.58%
Max drawdown-45.37%-19.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ECON and XCNY