Screener
ECON vs XCEM
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF vs Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.31% less per year.
- XCEM is significantly larger than ECON — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECON has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECON | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $326M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.51% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.5% | +67.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.8% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.6% | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.32% | 20.78% |
| Max drawdown | -45.37% | -40.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ECON and XCEM
Explore further