Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XCNY vs XCEM

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

XCEM

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.16%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

  • XCEM is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XCEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XCNYXCEM
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.16%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$1.7B
Since20242015
Dividend yield2.41%2.71%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+36.3%+67.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+26.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.23
Volatility 1Y16.58%20.78%
Max drawdown-19.70%-40.92%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XCNY and XCEM