Screener
EDGF vs IIGD
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.66% less per year.
- EDGF is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; IIGD uses index tracking.
- IIGD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | IIGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | 2.32% |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -11.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and IIGD
Explore further