Screener
IIGD vs VRIG
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.17% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IIGD follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IIGD | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.6% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.33% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -11.48% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IIGD and VRIG
Explore further