Screener
EDGF vs SYSB
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- SYSB costs 0.54% less per year.
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; SYSB uses index tracking.
- SYSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | SYSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | 4.64% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | 3.79% |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -18.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and SYSB
Explore further