Screener
EEM vs EUM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EEM costs 0.23% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM follows a index tracking strategy; EUM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | EUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2003 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 4.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.5% | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | -16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.88% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -67.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and EUM
Explore further