Screener
EUM vs IEMG
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.86% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EUM follows a inverse strategy; IEMG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EUM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EUM | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.19% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.5% | +49.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.0% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.05 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 19.35% |
| Max drawdown | -67.24% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EUM and IEMG
Explore further