Screener
EUM vs EEMS
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- EEMS costs 0.23% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EUM follows a inverse strategy; EEMS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EUM | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $452M |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.19% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.5% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.0% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.05 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -67.24% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EUM and EEMS
Explore further