Screener
EEM vs KEMX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.48% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $118M |
| Since | 2003 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.5% | +74.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.88% | 22.26% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and KEMX
Explore further