Screener
KEMX vs EEMS
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.48% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMX | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $452M |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.0% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.4% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.26% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -38.80% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMX and EEMS
Explore further