Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KEMX vs EMXC

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

KEMX

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$118M

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$22.1B

Key differences

  • EMXC is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

KEMXEMXC
Annual cost (TER)0.24%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$118M$22.1B
Since20192017
Dividend yield2.67%2.27%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+74.0%+73.4%
CAGR 3Y+29.4%+29.0%
CAGR 5Y+14.0%+13.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.301.33
Volatility 1Y22.26%21.58%
Max drawdown-38.80%-42.81%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KEMX and EMXC