Screener
EEM vs URTH
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.48% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM covers emerging markets markets; URTH covers global.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2003 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and URTH
Explore further