Screener
EEMA vs KEMX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
Both EEMA and KEMX are equity ETFs. EEMA charges 0.49% a year and KEMX 0.24%. The main difference: KEMX costs 0.25% less per year.
- KEMX costs 0.25% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than KEMX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $134M |
| Since | 2012 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 2.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.8% | +63.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.6% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.37% | 23.55% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -38.80% |
Similar to EEMA and KEMX
Explore further