Screener
KEMX vs EEM
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.48% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMX | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $28.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.0% | +51.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.4% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.26% | 19.88% |
| Max drawdown | -38.80% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMX and EEM
Explore further