Screener
EEMS vs EUM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EEMS costs 0.23% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMS follows a index tracking strategy; EUM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMS | EUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $452M | $9M |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 4.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | -16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.24% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -48.89% | -67.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMS and EUM
Explore further