Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EUM vs EEM

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

EUM

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$9M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • EEM costs 0.23% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EUM follows a inverse strategy; EEM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EUMEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$28.1B
Since20072003
Dividend yield4.19%1.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyinverseindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-32.5%+51.5%
CAGR 3Y-16.0%+23.6%
CAGR 5Y-5.8%+7.5%
Sharpe 3Y-1.051.07
Volatility 1Y20.34%19.88%
Max drawdown-67.24%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EUM and EEM