Screener
EFA vs DMXF
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.20% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than DMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; DMXF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $992M |
| Since | 2001 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 16.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and DMXF
Explore further