Screener
EFA vs ESGD
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- ESGD costs 0.12% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than ESGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | ESGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $11.3B |
| Since | 2001 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -33.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and ESGD
Explore further