Screener
EFA vs EZU
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.18% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; EZU covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $9.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -41.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and EZU
Explore further