Screener
EFAD vs EFG
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Key differences
- EFG costs 0.16% less per year.
- EFG is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and EFG
Explore further