Screener
EFG vs IEFA
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.27% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFG | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $180.7B |
| Since | 2005 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFG and IEFA
Explore further