Screener
EFG vs EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA is significantly larger than EFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFG | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2005 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFG and EFA
Explore further