Screener
EFAS vs EASG
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- EASG costs 0.41% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $67M |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and EASG
Explore further