Screener
EFAS vs EFA
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.23% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and EFA
Explore further