Screener
EFG vs GLOF
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.14% less per year.
- EFG is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFG | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $196M |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFG and GLOF
Explore further