Screener
EFG vs SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- EFG costs 0.06% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFG | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $14.4B |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFG and SCZ
Explore further