Screener
EFO vs EFV
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFV costs 0.64% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than EFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFO follows a leveraged strategy; EFV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFO | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $30.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.85% | 14.28% |
| Max drawdown | -63.52% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFO and EFV
Explore further